Independent Thinking Ltd

You are here: Home > Cool > Articles
A Paediatric Neurologist Speaks

Using the science of the brain to understand how children learn

Show Reader Friendly Version

A Paediatric Neurologist Speaks

Andrew Curran MB BCh BaO MRCPaedsI MRCPaedsUK MRCPCH DipCH DRCOG is a Research Fellow in Paediatric Neurology at Alder Hay Children's Hospital in Liverpool. He is also committed to helping schools benefit from the latest insights into the workings of the human brain to help them make a difference for children of all ages.

We asked Andrew to put together a few words exclusively for the Independent Thinking Ltd website.

What's more, you can e-mail him any general queries and questions you may have about the learning (or reluctant to learn) brain and he will do his best to answer you. He cannot, of course, go into details about specific cases and when in doubt you should always consult the appropriate channels. But to put that general question that you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask simply click here and we will do our best.

What's more we will aim to compile these questions as part of a book Andrew is working on with Ian Gilbert.

Watch this space!

“I am not a school teacher and have no right to try and tell you how to do your jobs. What I am is a paediatric neurologist who has spent (and continues to spend) a great deal of my time studying the brain and how it works. Modern science (whilst still a dead duck compared to the wonder that is nature) has now produced enough hard evidence to allow us to start on the long path of developing clear pictures as to how and especially why people learn. Strangely enough, it all comes down to neurochemicals, those little chemicals in the brain that dictate our every waking thought and feeling and which, if turned on in the right way, can significantly enhance our ability to learn.

They are very powerful little chemicals. So small that even the most powerful microscope in the world cannot see them, yet as they buzz back and forth between our nerve cells, they achieve the most miraculous things. They can make a cell so excited that it dies (not very useful). They can make a cell so inhibited that it sits in suspended animation for days or weeks (also not very useful). Most importantly, they can stimulate the necessary processes within the cell to make it grow a brand new connection to another cell.

And that is probably the most useful thing in the world, because that is learning.

Everything you are, everything you feel and everything you think is because nerve cells in your brain have grown connections to other nerve cells to form a pattern of firing that is hard-wired into you. Every time that pattern fires, you will remember that feeling, relive that moment, recall that fact, re-experience that taste.

When it comes right down to it, that is what you as teachers are trying to achieve in the classroom. You are trying to get the right chemicals into the right place at the right time so that each individual child in front of you joins up some more nerve cells and learns what you are trying to teach.

What are these chemicals? How can we help the child to get all this right? Numerous approaches have been (and are being) tried. In the old days it was threat, violence, terror. Very bad at producing the right mix of chemicals those things. In fact, modern science can tell us that they were actually very good at switching off the conscious mind and pushing memory into unconscious processes. Nowadays, teaching is much more to do with getting children involved. Multi-sensory learning, multiple intelligence motivation, small group work, circle time, the list is long and growing longer. The key to all these approaches is the neurochemistry they switch on. Turn on the right chemistry in the right amounts in the right places and learning will occur.

And strangely, after all the money that has been spent, and all the vast laboratories that have been built, what it all comes down to had been worked out by the old village wise woman thousands of years ago – the most powerful way to get any child to learn is to make them feel understood as an individual, to thus build their self esteem and hence their confidence. And if they are in a situation where their self esteem is good and they feel confident, they will feel engaged. It is that feeling of engagement – a relaxed, focused attention on someone with whom you feel safe, that is the most powerful aid to learning yet to be identified.

Focused attention in a relaxed but alert individual who feels a sense of reward or expected reward releases a chemical mix in the learning areas of the brain that wire together nerve cells into repeated patterns of firing. Those patterns of firing represent knowledge and the more often the child is exposed to that type of learning environment, the more positive their experience of school will become and the more they will learn.

For me my continuing journey through the myriad mazes of scientific fact remains fascinating. Every new paper offers the chance to answer another question. It is to try and share some of that enthusiasm that I have become involved with Independent Thinking and I hope that I will soon get the opportunity to present some of my fascination to you.”

To go to Andrew Curran's profile please click here.


Comments:

Teaching children with a damaged brain, some who are profoundly damaged
By ? on Friday, February 13, 2004 (GST)

I was very inspired and enthused by Ian's talk today at Reading Early Years Development & Childcare Partnership Conference.

I teach in the nursery of a Special School where all our children havea veriety of special educational needs complicated often by profound physical needs.  It is fascinating trying to find ways to tap into ways to communicate and link with such children,and I find I can only start with observing & getting to know the child.  A lot is trial and error, hit and miss.  And a lot of what I want to do, & time to do it etc is hampered by the strictures of profiles, targets, record keeping and endless paperwork which overwhelms most teachers. IS there somethign easy and short that will give me ideas as to how to approach teaching a boy whose only interests are music, light and water.  He is not motivated to make marks, build, explore etc.  Eye contact and concentration are minimal. He has CP. Similarly with another child whose concentration is fleating - query Angelman syndrome - what could I learn about motivation for these children?  I totally agree with and practice a holistic approach and do all I can to encourage the parents too. Just wish I understood more so as to imform my own teaching methods and make my aims realistic.

Any suggestions please?

Also, what suggestions for building self esteem in myself/positive thinking so i actually DO believe it?

Thanks

Reply to this Comment

Andrew Curran's ideas
By ladignac on Thursday, May 06, 2004 (GST)

Having heard Andrew speak at a Heads Conference at Poole recently, I have been thinking about the links between the physical act of awareness and reaction to external issues. Call it what you will, interest, motivation, arousal, it has always struck me that it is the initial interaction or engagement with an object or situation that allows the thinking track to start.

 

If individuals are able to effectively lock parts of their brain to shut out painful memories, to what extent would children be able to do something similar thereby limiting their interaction with some form of experience?

 

A supplementary question would be to do with the "electronic" generation. If children are interacting with and through some kind of screen environment, how is this adjusting their ability to interact with real life situations?

 

Andrew showed at Poole recently that he has much to add to the general knowledge of the education profession regarding the workings of the brain.

 

Certain themes seem to recur over time. The notion of visualisation, carrying pictures in your head, coupled with an appropriate vocabulary to express ideas is not novel. It has a long pedigree. Should we not be seeking ways to create appropriate curricula that encourage routes into thinking, instead of looking for the quick fix solution?

Thanks Andrew, for making me laugh out loud at a heads conference and for leaving much to consider.

Chris Chivers

Rowlands Castle Primary

Reply to this Comment

Response
By acurran on Monday, June 28, 2004 (GST)

Dear Chris,

Thanks for the comments and sorry for the delay in replying.

Attention i.e. paying attnetion is a neurochemically dependent activity of the brain (as are all its activities). In this instance dopmaine seems to be the main attnetional chemical - paying attnetion occurs because the limbic brain has decided that something is worth sttending to. Dopamine of course is also our main learning chemical - no big surpris ethat the saem chemical that makes you pay attnetion is also the one through which you learn about what it is oyu are paying attnetion to. Blocking out at this level then becomes simply not paying attnetion. Can we block out things that are painful/noxious? Of course, it is the whole basis of emotional pathology really. I think children just dont see the biological perogative in paying attnetion to a lot that goes on in classrooms - hence the need to involve them emotionally first - then the learning will occur almost by default. Interacting with electronic media is fine as part of an overall rich environment - after all my 6 year old learnt most of his maths from interactive computer programmes. But to only use it as learning fo rlife is obviously useless - most of life isnt as thick as the average computer!

As for creating appropriate curricula that incourage routes into thinking - absolutely. It is what the whole of education should be about. Find the route into learning by engaging the child's emotions and you will have a happy human who is ehgaged with you in the learning task - and how good for their self esteem as well!

Take care,

Andrew

Reply to this Comment

Further thoughts on impact of emotion within experience
By ladignac on Friday, November 24, 2006 (GST)

Dear Andrew,

I've had the chance to revisit the Independent Thinking site and have picked up your reply to a comment that I made a couple of years ago.

Since that time I have a period of deep reflection, caused mainly by the  death, from cancer, of my wife about 16 months ago. It was, to say the least, a life changing experience. I don't really need to know what chemicals were flowing around my body at that time, no doubt suppressing immediate emotions to allow some kind of function to continue. In fact, it hardly matters, as my capacity to feel, think and reflect was not significantly affected. Slowly reality became less painful and aspects of the real world began to impinge positively, at which point life began to turn my way again.

In terms of children and learning, I've been thinking that we divorce children too much from the real world, cushioning them from any potential problems, so that minor difficulty can be magnified to incur greater impact than should be the case. This can lead to a heightened anxiety, rather than the calm that  parents and teachers may wish to be creating. At its simplest, do children actually engage with life to the fullest extent available to them?

Making sense of experience appears to me to be the most significant factor in any curriculum for learning. How much sanitised experience is being offered to children in and out of school and what is the importance of that for their futures as reflective, learning adults?

 

Reply to this Comment

re experience and growth
By a.curran on Monday, December 18, 2006 (GST)

Dear rowlands,

I apologise for the delay in responding to your comments. Firstly every condolence for the loss of your wife. That has obviously been hard for you.

Secondly I concur exactly with your other comments. I was talking to an extremely gifted head teacher last year who had put the emotions on the walls of the school. I asked her in what order they were put. She replied that the good emotions were at the top and the bad emotions were at the bottom. I asked her what were bad and good emotions?

I personally dont think that there is a value judgement to put on emotions. Emotions are simply a fact of our lives. The sooner we get to know them all intimately - and thus be able to experience them openly and therefore not be under their compulsion, the sooner they stop directing the directions our lives take. I fully support intuitive actions and following instincts, but I think there is a place for feeling the instinct, reveling in the intuition, but then calmly thinking through the whys and wherefores of the revelation before acting.

Ian and myself came up with a new way of looking a the oldest paradigm in the book - STAR. Be a STAR. Pretty corny, but it stands for stop/start; think, act, reflect. Nothing new there, but at its core is basic emotional intelligence.

Yours,

Andrew

Reply to this Comment

<< Back to 'Articles'

Add Your Comment